Back to all articles
5 MIN READ

Prepare a training session with Claude: objectives, activities and assessment

By Dorian Laurenceau

Claude can help prepare a training session by organizing objectives, activities and materials. The trainer still chooses what learners should achieve and verifies the content. A polished lesson plan is not evidence that the session will work with your audience.

Our fictional example is a 90-minute adult-learning session on checking AI-generated answers. It requires no personally filmed videos: documents, discussion, diagrams and quizzes provide the learning activities. References were checked on October 14, 2026.

Define an observable learning objective

Replace “understand AI” with an action you can observe: “identify unsupported claims in a short response and justify two corrections using supplied sources.” State the audience, prior knowledge, accessibility needs and available equipment.

Tell Claude about the constraints. A session with shared computers, unreliable internet and mixed reading levels requires a different plan from an individual online course. Ask it to list assumptions instead of quietly assuming that every learner has an account and a laptop.

Design the assessment before the activities

Create a short fictional answer containing one correct claim, one unsupported claim and one misleading calculation. Label it explicitly as a teaching example rather than a real study or client report. Supply the source documents and an answer key.

The final task asks learners to annotate the answer, locate supporting passages and correct the calculation. Decide what counts as success before writing slides. This helps distinguish demonstrated reasoning from simply repeating the trainer’s explanation.

Build a realistic 90-minute sequence

StageTimeLearner activityEvidence of learning
Starting point10 minutesIdentify a claim that needs checkingInitial explanation
Worked example15 minutesCompare an answer with its sourceLocated evidence
Pair exercise25 minutesAnnotate the fictional answerShared corrections
Group review20 minutesExplain disagreementsReasoned discussion
Individual task20 minutesApply the method to a new exampleAnnotated response

These durations sum to 90 minutes. They are planning assumptions, not measured performance. Include instructions, transitions and the expected learner output in each stage. If the group needs more support, reduce the amount of material rather than compressing every activity unrealistically.

Produce materials and a correction guide

Ask Claude for separate learner and trainer documents. The learner version contains the task and sources; the trainer version adds expected observations, common mistakes and possible follow-up questions. Check that answers are not accidentally included in the learner handout.

Use concise diagrams to show the verification process and short quizzes to reveal misunderstandings. A quiz answer should explain why it is correct. It should not reward learners merely for memorizing a product name or repeating an absolute rule that has exceptions.

Review accuracy and accessibility

Open the referenced sources and check every important claim. Adjust vocabulary and document layout for the audience. Prepare an offline version of the materials so the session remains possible if an assistant or network is unavailable.

UNESCO’s guidance on generative AI in education provides a broader framework around human agency and appropriate use. It does not certify this lesson plan. Claude Academy is a source of product learning resources, not a substitute for your instructional judgment.

Loading diagram…

Draft your training sequence

Prepare your instruction here. This module sends no data to a model: copy your brief into your chosen tool.

View the starter instruction
Prepare a 90-minute session from the supplied audience, objective and constraints. Design the assessment first, then activities whose durations sum to 90 minutes. Specify learner outputs, instructions, materials, correction guidance and an offline alternative. Mark assumptions and do not invent research findings or student outcomes.

Verify the output (0/4)

Improve after teaching

Collect the questions learners actually asked, the mistakes they made and the stages that took longer than expected. Compare these observations with the plan. Revise one part at a time and preserve the earlier version so the reason for each change remains visible.

Download the training preparation kit. For feedback on submitted work, use the human-reviewed rubric workflow.

Test Your Knowledge

0 / 3 answered

Q1.Which objective is observable?

3 questions remaining

Sources

GO DEEPER — FREE GUIDE

Module 0 — Prompting Fundamentals

Build your first effective prompts from scratch with hands-on exercises.

D

Dorian Laurenceau

Full-Stack Developer & Learning Designer

Full-stack web developer and learning designer. I spent 4 years as a freelance full-stack developer and 4 years teaching React, JavaScript, HTML/CSS and WordPress to adult learners. Today I design learning paths in web development and AI, grounded in learning science. I founded learn-prompting.fr to make AI practical and accessible, and built the Bluff app to gamify political transparency.

Prompt EngineeringLLMsFull-Stack DevelopmentLearning DesignReact
Published: October 14, 2026

One practical AI workflow in your inbox

Methods, resources and new exercises. Free, unsubscribe at any time.